Attitude
of Customers towards the Mobile Service Providers: A Study on Kolkata City
Dr.
Sunil Kumar Pradhan1, Dr. Suman Kalyan Chaudhury2
1Lecturer, Dept. of
Business Administration, Berhampur University, Berhampur, Odisha.
2Placement Officer,
Business Administration, Berhampur University, Berhampur, Odisha.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: sumankalyan72@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Mobile services in India have uplifted the standard of
living of the people. It has touched the
heart of millions of people. Today without mobile services customers felt they
are helpless. After opening up of the economy in India, mobile services have
grown exponentially. As a result it becomes imperative for the mobile services
provider to understand the needs and preferences of customers to upgrade the
services in the future. In present scenario, it is not only confined to the
selling of products, advertisement and sales promotion but it includes consumer
satisfaction as a whole. Mobile service providers are always concerned about
the up gradation of the services for their consumers. As it is a service, which
is intangible in nature, it is imperative for the service providers to know
about the perception of the customers. This becomes a challenge for the service
providers to convince the customer to avail the services. This paper tries to
explore the perception of the customers towards the mobile service providers in
Kolkata city.
KEYWORDS: Economy, Customer Satisfaction, Perception, Attitude.
Now-a-days, mobile phones have grown into a product of
necessity for the people from all walks of life. An individual can get in touch
with his family, friends and business associates anytime and anywhere at a affordable
cost. We know India is one of the fastest growing telecommunication markets in
the world. The key driver for the growth of the Indian telecom market is that
the cellular phone becomes an essential item in the hands of every individual.
Indian telecommunications industry1 is the world’s fastest growing industry, with
846.32 million mobile phone subscribers2
as on March 2011. It has thereby registered
growth rate of 2.43% as compared
to Feb. 2011. It is also the second3 largest telecommunication network
in the world in terms of no. of wireless connections after China. The Mobile
service is one of the fastest growing industries in India. With the economy
opening up, competition in this sector is increasing. The entry of private
companies promoted the use of cellular phones in the country. There are 25
private companies providing mobile services in 19 telecom circles and four
metro cities, covering 1500 towns across the country. The lists3 of mobile network operators in India are given on
next page.
Presently the Indian mobile industry is witnessing a
stiff competition. The mobile services providers are providing various kinds of
services to the customers to attract the attention of the new customers and
retain the existing customers. As a result, key players are trying to know the
attitude of the customers towards the mobile services providers. This helps
them to develop good strategy for the better satisfaction of the customers.
NEED FOR THE STUDY:
Way back in 1995, Kolkata was the first city6 in the country to get
the mobile services from the Mobile Net provider. The then Chief Minister of
west Bengal had inaugurated Modi Telstra’s Mobile Net
services in Kolkata. The company a joint venture between India’s Modi Group and Australian Telecom giant Telstra was one of
the eight organizations who were given license to provide cellular services,
two for each of the Indian’s major cities. However Kolkata was ranked the last
amongst the four metros in terms of consumer satisfaction. That was the outcome
of the survey conducted during September and December 2006 by Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India.
This was being conducted to gauge the customer
satisfaction and evaluate performance of the cellular service providers. This
outcome was not a surprise to 3.2 million mobile subscribers in the city.
Basically they were very much dissatisfied about the billing services for
prepaid and postpaid connections, network performance and availability and
helpline services.
|
S No. |
Operator |
Technology |
Ownership |
|
1 |
Airtel |
GSM, EDGE, HSPA |
Bharti Enterprises (64.76%) Singapore
Telecommunications (32%) Vodafone (4.4%) |
|
2 |
Vodafone |
GSM, EDGE, HSPA |
Vodafone (67%)
and Essar Group (33%) |
|
3 |
Reliance
Communication |
CdmaOne, EVDOGSM, HSPA, WiMAX |
Reliance (67%)
and Public (26%) |
|
4 |
Idea |
GSM, EDGE, HSDPA |
Aditya Birla Group |
|
5 |
BSNL |
CdmaOne, EVDO |
State-Owned |
|
6 |
Tata DoCoMo |
CDMA, EVDO, WiMAX |
Tata-Teleservices |
|
7 |
Aircel |
GSM, EDGE, HSDPA |
Maxis
Communications (74%) |
|
8 |
Uninor |
GSM, EDGE |
Unitech Wireless |
|
9 |
Videocon |
GSM, EDGE, GPRS |
Videocon |
|
10 |
MTNL |
GSM, HSDPA
[WLL/EVDO] |
State-owned |
|
11 |
Loop Mobile |
GSM, GPRS |
Essar Group (8.0%) |
|
12 |
MTS |
CDMA EVDO |
Sistema (73.71%) and Shyam
Group (23.79%) |
|
13 |
S Tel |
GSM, GPRS |
Siva Group (51%) |
|
14 |
Ping Mobile |
GSM,CDMA |
HFCL Infotel Limited |
|
15 |
Cheers Mobile |
GSM, GPRS |
Etisalat |
Source : Telecom industry, Govt.
of India.
This has prompted to undertake the study on the
attitude of the customers towards the mobile services providers in Kolkata
city.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
Research suggests that cognitive factors of service
quality and perceived value and affective enjoyment may determine customer
loyalty towards mobile service providers4 (Gerpott;
Rams and Schindler, 2001; Lee Murphy and Swilley,
2007). Another researcher has suggested that consumers may perceive products as
serving hedonics and instrumental functions5 (Chaudhuri
and Holbrook, 2002; Childer, et.al’2001). Seth et al
(2008) analyzed that there is relative importance of service quality attributes
and showed that responsiveness is the most importance dimension followed by
reliability, customer perceived network quality, assurance,
convenience, empathy and
tangibles. Liu (2002) found that the choice of a cellular phone is
characterized by two attitudes: attitude towards the mobile phone brand on one
hand and attitude towards the network on the other. Samuvel
(2002) observed that most of the respondents consider size, quality, price,
instrument servicing are an important factors for selecting the handset while
majority of the respondents are satisfied over the payment system, quality of
services, coverage area and the process of attending the complaints regarding
their mobile service provider. Nandhini (2001)
examined that attitude of the respondents using cell phones was not influenced
by either education or occupation and income. Kalpana
and Chinnadurai (2006) found that advertisement play
a dominant role in influencing the customers but most of the customers are of
opinion that promotional strategies of cellular companies are more sale
oriented rather than customer oriented. Haque et al
(2007) suggested that price, service quality, product quality and availability,
and promotional offer play a main role during the time to choose
telecommunication service provider.
OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY:
The broad objective of the study is to know the
attitude of the customers towards the mobile service providers in Kolkata city.
The specific objectives of the study are as follows.
1. To explore the attitude of customers towards
the customer care services provided by the mobile services providers;
2. To study the services provider’s service in
activating the SIM purchased by the
customers;
3. To know the network performance of the
service providers;
4. To understand the availability of the plans
provided by the service providers for the customers ;
5. To find the billing services provided by the
service provider.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:
The study as
reported here is unavoidably limited by certain constraints. The small sample
size i. e. 50 respondents of Kolkata city put
restriction on the generalizability of the findings.
The limitations of the study are as follows:
1. Availability of time posed a major
constraint
2. Sample size was small
3. Wide coverage is not there, as it is
restricted to a particular area due to constraint
of time.
METHODOLOGY:
A convenience survey in Kolkata yielded a cleaned
sample of 50 observations. There were 32 males versus 18 females. Respondents
ranged in age from 20 to 40 years and with a mean age of 35years. All
respondents owned a mobile phone and had active connection with local service
providers. Respondents indicated on a 5-point Likert
scale, the extent that they used mobile service for their own purpose. In
nutshell, the research methodology has been given below. This study is based on
the primary data as well as secondary data obtained from the various published
sources.
Data sources- Primary data – basically data collected
in the Salt Lake City, Kolkata.
Research instruments- Questionnaires–close ended
questions.
Sampling method- Convenience Sampling.
Sample size- 50.
Data Analysis and interpretation
1. A. Age wise distribution of the
respondents using mobile phones
TABLE - 1
|
AGE |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
< 20 |
1 |
2 |
|
20-30 |
14 |
28 |
|
30-40 |
35 |
70 |
Table-1 shows that 35% of the total
respondents is in the age group of 35-40years and 14% of the people are in the
age group of 20-30years. In other words people belonging to the upper age group
are using mobile phone more as compared to the people in younger age group.
B .Relationship between the ages of
respondents and Mobile service
Providers
TABLE-2
|
|
Mobile service
providers |
Total |
|
|||||
|
Vodafone |
Airtel |
Others |
|
|
||||
|
Ages of respondents |
less than 20 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
MARITAL STATUS |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
20-30 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
14 |
SINGLE |
31 |
62 |
|
|
30-40 |
14 |
11 |
10 |
35 |
MARRIED |
19 |
38 |
|
|
Total |
|
23 |
15 |
12 |
50 |
|
||
Table-2 shows that 14 respondents in the age
group of 30-40 have chosen Vodafone, 11
respondents have chosen Airtel.
2. A.
Education wise distribution of the sample
Table-3 shows that 72% of the customers have completed
their graduation and 26% of customers have completed their post-graduation.
TABLE-3
|
EDUCATION |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
10TH |
1 |
2 |
|
GRADUATE |
36 |
72 |
|
POSTGRADUATE |
13 |
26 |
B. Relationship between Education and Mobile
service providers
TABLE-4
|
|
Mobile service
providers |
Total |
|||
|
Vodafone |
Airtel |
Others |
|
||
|
Education |
10th pass |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Graduate |
15 |
11 |
10 |
36 |
|
|
Post-graduate |
7 |
4 |
2 |
13 |
|
|
Total |
|
23 |
15 |
12 |
50 |
3. A. Income Wise Distribution of the Sample
Table -5 shows that 84% of customers are
getting the incomes of above Rs.20000/month and 14% of customers are getting
the incomes in the range of Rs.10001-20000.
TABLE - 5
|
INCOME /MONTH |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
<5000 |
1 |
2 |
|
10001-20000 |
7 |
14 |
|
ABOVE 20001 |
42 |
84 |
B.
Relationship between Income
and Mobile service providers
TABLE-6
|
|
Ph Brand User |
Total |
|||
|
Vodafone |
Airtel |
Others |
|
||
|
Income |
<5000 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
10001-20000 |
3 |
4 |
|
7 |
|
|
above 20001 |
19 |
11 |
12 |
42 |
|
|
Total |
|
23 |
15 |
12 |
50 |
4.A.
Marital Status Wise Distribution of Sample
Table-7 shows that 62% of customers are
unmarried/Single whereas 38% of customers are married.
TABLE - 7
|
MARITAL
STATUS |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
SINGLE |
31 |
62 |
|
MARRIED |
19 |
38 |
5.A.
Profession Wise Distribution of Sample
Table-8 shows
that 78% of customers are in the service industry and 20% of customers are in the business.
TABLE – 8
|
PROFESSION |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
STUDENT |
0 |
0 |
|
SERVICE |
39 |
78 |
|
BUSINESSMAN |
10 |
20 |
|
SELF EMPLOYED |
1 |
2 |
Relationship between the Mobile
Service Provider and Profession
TABLE-9
|
|
Profession |
Total |
|||
|
Service |
Business man |
self employed |
|
||
|
Service Provider
|
Vodafone |
21 |
1 |
1 |
23 |
|
Airtel |
12 |
3 |
|
15 |
|
|
Others |
6 |
6 |
|
12 |
|
|
Total |
|
39 |
10 |
1 |
50 |
6. Connection Wise Distribution of the Sample
Table-10
shows that 74% of customers are having the post-paid connections whereas 37% of
customers are having the pre-paid connections.
TABLE-10
|
TYPE OF CONNECTION |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
PREPAID |
13 |
26 |
|
POST PAID |
37 |
74 |
7. Distribution of Mobile Users among Different Service
Providers
Table-11 shows
that 46% of customers are using Vodafone, 30% of customers are using Airtel, 14% of customers are using Tata Indicom
and 10% of customers are using BSNL.
TABLE-11
|
MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDERS USING |
No. of customers |
% of customers |
|
AIRTEL |
15 |
30 |
|
BSNL |
5 |
10 |
|
RELIANCE |
0 |
0 |
|
VODAFONE |
23 |
46 |
|
TATA INDICOM |
7 |
14 |
|
AIRCEL |
0 |
0 |
|
ANY OTHER |
0 |
0 |
8. Comparative Analysis of Vodafone and Airtel
Table-12 is
prepared by analyzing the data sheet, for the
comparison of Vodafone and Airtel services with reference to the different factors.
From the
table-12, we can say that 52% of Vodafone customers have given highest rating
of 5 whereas the 53% of Airtel customers have given
highest ratings of 4 with reference to the C1 factor.
With reference to
the C2 factor, 78% of Vodafone customers have given highest rating of 4 whereas
67% of Airtel customers have given the highest rating
of 4.
With reference to
the C3 factor, 70% of Vodafone customers have given the highest rating of 4
whereas 80% of Airtel customers have given the
highest rating of 4.
With reference to
the C4 factor, 83% of Vodafone customers rated 4 as compared to 47% of Airtel customers.
With reference to
C5 factor, 52% of Vodafone customers rated 4 as compared to 53% of Airtel customers.
9. Comparison
of Age Group, Income and Post Paid Connection with Mobile Service Providers
Table-13 shows that in the age group of 30-40, 47% are
having Vodafone, 37%are having Airtel, 17% are having
BSNL and 5% are having Tata Indicom.
Out of the income group of above Rs.20000, 45% are
having Vodafone,26% are having Airtel,17% are having Tata Indicom
and 12% are having BSNL.
From the table, it also shows that among the postpaid connections,
43% customers are having Vodafone, 29% of customers are having Airtel ,14% of customers are having BSNL and 14% of
customers are having Tata Indicom.
TABLE-12
|
|
C1 |
|
C2 |
|
C3 |
|
C4 |
|
C5 |
|
|
Mobile service providers |
% of customer |
Highest Ratings |
% of customers |
Highest rating |
% of customers |
Highest rating |
% of customers |
Highest rating |
% of customers |
Highest rating |
|
Vodafone |
52 |
5 |
78 |
4 |
70 |
4 |
83 |
4 |
52 |
4 |
|
Airtel |
53 |
4 |
67 |
4 |
80 |
4 |
47 |
4 |
53 |
4 |
Where C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 refers to
the following table.
|
CUSTOMER CARE IS
ABLE TO HANDLE CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS DIRECTLY OR IMMEDIATELY (C 1) |
SERVICE
PROVIDERS IN ACTIVATING THE SIM ( C2) |
QUALITY OF
SERVICE NETWORK(C3) |
AVAILABILITY OF
PLAN OPTIONS(C4) |
BILLING
SERVICES(C5) |
TABLE-13
|
Mobile service providers VARIABLES |
VODAFONE |
AIRTEL |
BSNL |
TATA INDICOM |
|
AGE
GROUPS-30-40 |
14(47%) |
11(37%) |
5(17%) |
5(17%) |
|
ABOVE
20000 |
19(45%) |
11(26%) |
5(12%) |
7(17%) |
|
POST PAID
CONNECTION |
15(43%) |
10(29%) |
5(14%) |
5(14%) |
10. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
(A) To
test the association between Marital status and types of connection
H0: There is no association
between Marital Status and types of connection
Level of Significance: 0.10
Marital Status * Types of Connection Cross
tabulation
|
|
|
Types of Connection |
Total |
|
|
|
|
Pre-paid |
Post-Paid |
|
|
Marital Status |
Single |
12 |
19 |
31 |
|
Married |
1 |
18 |
19 |
|
|
Total |
|
13 |
37 |
50 |
|
|
Exact Sig.
(1-sided) |
|
|
Fisher's Exact
Test |
0.008 |
|
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is rejected at 10% level of
significance. There is association between Types of connection and Marital
Status.
(B) To test the association between income and
types of connection:
H0: There is no association between income
and types of connection
Level of Significance: 0.10
|
Income group |
Types of Connection |
|
|
Pre Paid |
Post Paid |
|
|
Less than Rs 20000 |
6 |
2 |
|
Above Rs 20000 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
Exact Sig.
(1-sided) |
|
|
Fisher's Exact
Test |
0.002 |
|
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is rejected at 10% level of
significance. Therefore, there is association between income and types of
connection
(C) To test the association between types of
connection and profession
H0: There is no association between income
and types of connection
|
|
Types of Connection |
Total |
|
|
Pre-paid |
Post-Paid |
|
|
|
Salaried |
10 |
29 |
39 |
|
Non-salaried |
3 |
8 |
10 |
|
|
13 |
37 |
50 |
Fisher’s exact test
shows, P = 0.60
Conclusion: Null hypothesis is accepted at 10% level of
significance. Therefore there is no association between Profession and types of
connection.
(D) To test the association ages of respondents
and types of connection.
H0: There is no association between ages of
respondents and types of connection
|
|
Types of
Connection |
Total |
||
|
Pre-paid |
Post-Paid |
|||
|
Ages of
respondent |
less than 30 |
9 |
6 |
15 |
|
30-40 |
4 |
31 |
35 |
|
|
Total |
|
13 |
37 |
50 |
Using Fisher’s exact test Calculated P < 0.10
Conclusion: We reject the null hypothesis and conclude
that there is association between ages of respondents and types of connection.
(E) Multiple correlations:
Predictors: (Constant), Billing Service, Sim Activation, Plan Availability, Customer Care
Dependent Variable: Service Quality
|
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
|
0.747 |
0.557 |
0.518 |
Conclusion: 56% of the variance of Service Quality is
explained by the independent variables Billing Service, Sim
Activation, Plan Availability and Customer Care.
Null Hypothesis, H0: R Square = 0
ANOVA
|
|
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
Regression |
10.581 |
4 |
2.645 |
14.173 |
0.000 |
|
Residual |
8.399 |
45 |
.187 |
|
|
|
Total |
18.980 |
49 |
|
|
|
a Predictors:
(Constant), Billing Service, Sim Activation, Plan
Availability, Customer Care
b Dependent
Variable: Service Quality
Conclusion: The value of R Square is Significant. There
is significant correlation between the dependent variable Service quality and
independent variables Billing Service, Sim
Activation, Plan Availability and Customer Care.
(F) Discriminant
analysis:
Dependent Variable: Types of Connection
Independent Variables: Ages of Respondents and Income
of Respondents
Canonical Discriminant
Function Coefficients
|
|
Function |
|
1 |
|
|
Ages of respondents |
1.494 |
|
Income |
1.381 |
|
(Constant) |
-7.898 |
Types of connection = - 7.898+ 1.494* Ages of
respondents +1.381* Income
Classification
Results
|
|
Predicted Group
Membership |
Total |
||
|
|
Types of
Connection |
Pre-paid |
Post-Paid |
|
|
Count |
Pre-paid |
10 |
3 |
13 |
|
Post-Paid |
7 |
30 |
37 |
|
|
% |
Pre-paid |
76.9 |
23.1 |
100.0 |
|
Post-Paid |
18.9 |
81.1 |
100.0 |
|
Conclusion:
80.0% of original grouped cases correctly classified.
CONCLUSION:
The study in hand reveals that consumers prefer a
particular mobile phone service provider on the basis of call tariffs, network
coverage and value added services. It is concluded from the study that
consumers prefer prepaid plans and all most every consumer treat their mobile
phone as a necessity. It is concluded from the study that majority of consumers
are aware about the services offered by their mobile phone operators. The study
also reveals that consumers are satisfied with the services offered by their
mobile by their mobile phone operators. Sometimes, consumers face problems of
poor clarity, call drop and poor network but overall they are satisfied with
the services offered to them. The study says that consumers are satisfied with
the process of solution of their problems and queries. Vodafone is providing good
service to the customers as compared to the other service providers. With
reference to the customer care service, Vodafone provides good services than
the other mobile service providers. Vodafone also provides good service in
activating the SIM of the customers. Airtel provides
good network connectivity as compared to the other service providers. With
reference to the availability of the plan options, Vodafone provides lot of
options for the customers as compared to the other service providers. Both the service
providers namely Airtel and Vodafone, provides good
billing services to their customers.
SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDY:
By taking into account of more samples, we can better
understand the attitude of customers towards the mobile service providers with reference
to the customer care services, network connectivity, availability of plan
options and billing services. This study can further be spread over the whole
city of Kolkata.
REFERENCES:
2. Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India(13 June 2011). "Highlights
of Telecom Subscription Data as on 30th April 2011" (PDF). Press
release. Retrieved 13 June 2011
3. http://business.mapsofindia.com/india-industry/telecom.htmlTelecom
Industry India
4.
Gerpott, T. J., Rams, W., and Schindler, A., 2001. Customer retention, loyalty,
and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market.
Telecommunications Policy 25, 249-269
5.
Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook, M. B., 2002. Product-Class Effects
on Brand Commitment and Brand Outcomes: The Role of Brand Trust and Brand
Affect. Journal of Brand Management 10 (1), 33-58
7.
http://www.vikalpa.com/pdf/articles/2008/V33102_019_034.pdf
8.
Liu,
C.M. (2002). The effects of promotional activities on brand decision in the
cellular telephone industry. The Journal
of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 42-51.
APPENDIX -1 QUESTIONNAIRE
Instruction : -
Please put a tick mark ۷)
) where required.
1.
Name-
2.
Gender-
3.
Age- i. <20 ii.20-30 iii.30-40 iv.40-60 v. Above 60
(in years)
4. Educational
Level : i. Upto 10th
ii. + 2 iii. Graduate iv. Post-graduate.
5. Income/Month – i.
Below Rs 5000. ii. Rs 5000-10000,
iii. Rs.10001-20000. iv. Above Rs. 20000.
6. Marital
status: Single/Married.
7.
Occupation : i. Student ii.
Service
iii.
Businessman iv. Self-employed.
8.
What
type of connection are you using?
i. Pre-paid
ii. Post-paid.
9.
Which
of the mobile service providers are you using?
i. Airtel ii. BSNL
iii. Reliance iv. Vodafone.
v.
Tata Indicom. vi. Aircel vii. Any other. (Specify)
10. Rate the following factors from 5 to 1.
Tick the value (from 5 to 1) which you will think
appropriate.
a. Customer care is able to handle the customer
complaints directly and immediately.-
5 4 3 2 1
Very good Good
Average Not good Poor
b. Service provided in activating the SIM.
5 4 3 2 1
Very good Good
Average Not good Poor
c.
Quality
of service network.(Range, connectivity )
5 4 3 2 1
Very good Good
Average Not good Poor
d. Availability of Plan options
5 4 3 2 1
Very good Good
Average Not good Poor
v.
Billing services (in case of post paid) and deduction of prepaid balance
(in case of prepaid) (Whichever is
applicable?)
5 4 3 2 1
Very good Good
Average Not good Poor
Received on 24.03.2012 Accepted on 06.05.2012
©A&V
Publications all right reserved
Asian J. Management 3(2): April-June, 2012 page 80-85